Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners ask for clearer depiction of proposed overhead/carriage door at 44 Spring Street
Summary
Commission members asked the applicant to supply a single accurate elevation or manufacturer photo of the proposed overhead door—designed to read visually as a hinged carriage door—and to redraw the elevation showing the final selection before further review. The review was advisory only.
During the concept review for 44 Spring Street, commissioners focused repeatedly on the design of the new garage/entry door and asked the applicant to provide a clear, single elevation showing the selected product. John Myers noted that the packet contained multiple door options and asked for an elevation and, when available, a manufacturer image. The commission emphasized that, while the door will be an overhead sectional unit for operational reasons, it should present as a carriage‑style hinged door in the streetscape.
The applicant said he would redraw the elevation to reflect the intended door and, when possible, provide CAD or shop drawings from the manufacturer. Commissioners also requested clarity about glazing in the transom and whether the door would be a solid panel. "I would like a solid door," the applicant said, explaining a preference for privacy and security while keeping the upper transom intact. Because this was a concept review, the commission recorded these recommendations and asked the applicant to return with the clearer drawings rather than making a binding decision.
Provenance: topicintro SEG 050, topfinish SEG 354.
