Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cell Phone Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Policy committee backs stricter cell‑phone limits, recommends district buy classroom storage boxes
Summary
Beecher CUSD 200U policy committee debated a districtwide cell‑phone policy that would limit use during instructional time and require storage in teacher‑provided boxes or lockers, with exceptions for IEP/medical needs and designated instructional activities. Members recommended district purchase of ~$35 storage boxes for high‑school classrooms and forwarded handbook language for first reading.
The policy committee for Beecher CUSD 200U spent the bulk of the meeting reviewing a proposed electronic‑device policy that would limit student phone use during instructional time and require secure storage in classrooms.
The chair opened the discussion by outlining the state direction that each district must adopt a phone‑use policy. A staff member described the draft approach: "They're going to come down and say that every school district has to have a policy in place that address the cell phone usage," and proposed limiting use during instructional periods while allowing building‑level discretion on exact times.
Administrators and teachers described how different buildings would implement the rule. Mike, speaking as the district administrator present, summarized a classroom solution used in some schools: "Within the classroom, you walk in, you put it in the calculator case that we would buy or Miss Munson said there's a box now that she bought for $35... and you close it and there's no use." The committee discussed district purchase of those boxes so classrooms would be uniformly equipped and to reduce liability concerns tied to individually supplied containers.
Members debated enforcement and exceptions. The junior high and elementary staff favored keeping phones "out of sight" (locker or backpack) while high‑school staff preferred locked classroom boxes or teacher‑controlled containers for convenience during passing periods and lunch. The committee agreed to allow limited classroom exceptions for IEP‑related medical needs and identified instructional uses (production classes, some PE activities and occasional project days).
On discipline, the committee discussed a staged approach: warnings, temporary confiscation, parent contact, dean referral and escalating detention for repeat offenses. One member noted the importance of staff buy‑in: "We have to make sure we're all going to support it... if the board is not supporting and backing it, that's also [a problem]."
The committee directed staff to incorporate building‑specific language into revised handbook pages and recommended purchasing classroom boxes for the high school; the updated handbook language will be presented for 1st reading at the next board meeting.
The committee did not take a formal vote on final policy language during this meeting.
