Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Naming Principles topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs naming schools after people versus neutral, geographic names
Summary
Members noted a strong current of public comment opposed to person-based names and discussed whether the district rubric (which favors local historical and educational relevance) and policy requirements make person-based names more likely to advance.
Committee members said many public submissions favored nonperson, geographically descriptive names such as "Capital View," citing concerns that naming after individuals can create future controversy and expense. One member asked, "is it really that expensive to rename a school?" and Chelsea replied that costs vary by year and by what must be replaced but that she would work to publish historical cost information.
Several members said the district rubric rewards local, historical and educational relevance, which can advantage person-based names. A teacher on the committee said she "keeps going back to this because it gives me heart palpitations" to see opposition to naming after people but also emphasized how person-based names can be used in curriculum to teach habits of character. Chair Dan urged the group to be mindful of volume-driven campaigns and geographic residence of commenters when weighing written submissions.
Members noted the policy constraint under the legacy policy that two of the four finalists submitted must be deceased individuals, which further shapes the final slate forthcoming to the board.
