Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environmental Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge independent air, noise and PFAS studies before approving data‑center plans
Summary
Multiple residents and technical commenters told the Leavenworth County commission to require predictive air‑quality, acoustical and chemical studies (including PFAS disclosure) with independent peer review before permitting large data centers.
A string of residents, engineers and parents told the Leavenworth County commissioners they need independent, peer‑reviewed studies before any data‑center approvals.
Engineer Darren Stickel (S8) told the board that standard predictive tools—EPA‑approved air models, acoustical modeling, and disclosure of chemicals used in cooling and fire suppression—can and should be required before construction. "These studies can evaluate nitrogen oxides, fine particulate matter, carbon monoxide, formaldehyde, and other emissions under different weather conditions and operating scenarios," Stickel said.
DeCarl Skink (S12) urged that the county require independent peer review by consultants selected by the government and paid by applicants so the county does not rely solely on developer‑prepared studies. "Professional engineers, hydrogeologists, air quality specialists, acoustical engineers, and environmental scientists perform these kinds of predictive studies every day for large industrial projects," Skink told the board.
Speakers asked the commission to require full disclosure of chemicals, spill prevention plans, and monitoring as conditions of approval. County staff said they are preparing a public information website and additional outreach to share technical materials.
Source segments: public comment from S8 and S12.
