Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Legislation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission hears detailed briefings on competing tax‑lid bills; protest petition option would require about 21,000 signatures
Summary
County staff and counsel outlined differences between House and Senate property‑tax lid proposals (HB2396 and related Senate changes in SB35). The Senate version would cap growth at the lesser of 3% or CPI and shifts some protest-petition concepts back to an election format; commissioners urged local outreach to influence conference negotiations.
Thomas Henry, assistant county counselor (S10), briefed the board on competing bills that would limit property-tax growth. He said the Senate version in its current form would implement a cap based on the lesser of 3% or CPI and include a process for public challenge tied to an election. "It's a cap based on the lesser of 3% or, CPI," Henry said.
A commissioner (S8) described the protest-petition approach that had been in the House language and noted practicalities for Sedgwick County: the protest petition concept would have given the public a 30‑day window to gather signatures equal to 10% of those who voted in the last presidential election — roughly "a little more than 21,000 signatures," the commissioner said. Commissioners expressed concern about possible impacts on GO bond financing and credit rating and noted the bills are likely to go to conference committee; staff asked commissioners to coordinate outreach with local law-enforcement and corrections partners to support juvenile-corrections provisions under consideration.
Speakers cited: Thomas Henry, assistant county counselor (S10); Commissioner (S8); Justin (S2).
Provenance: topicintro SEG 623, topfinish SEG 762.
