Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Healthy Community Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission to review 2019 Healthy Community policy and explore school collaboration
Summary
Commissioners discussed updating the town's 2019 Healthy Community policy to reflect changes in tobacco, cannabis and alcohol law, and Alison Link offered to help convene community partners, potentially including age-appropriate participation by Hyde Park Elementary students, to implement the health-and-wellness chapter of the town plan.
Get email alerts on the Healthy Community Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission members discussed revising the town's 2019 Healthy Community policy to reflect legal and social changes since adoption. Alison Link, joining by Zoom, said the policy is "out of date" on topics such as Tobacco 21, the state cannabis framework and post-COVID alcohol policies and urged the commission to consider modest updates and implementation steps rather than rewriting the town plan itself.
"The Healthy Community policy from 2019 is out of date," Alison Link said, noting changes in state law and municipal authority since the policy was written. She proposed convening an ad hoc group—including town staff, community partners and, where appropriate, school representatives—to convert parts of the town plan's health-and-wellness chapter into actionable, current guidance.
Members asked whether elementary-school students should be engaged; Link and others clarified students would not be the primary authors but could participate in age-appropriate civic activities linked to implementation. Valerie, who said she would manage coordination with the rec committee and outreach to schools, described the presentation as a courtesy to the planning commission because the policy is referenced in the town plan and any policy changes must go to the select board for final approval.
Commissioners agreed to keep proposed edits light, to develop a process for community engagement, and to check whether the planning commission must formally review the policy before it goes to the select board. No formal vote was taken; staff follow-up and draft language were suggested as next steps.
