Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the CEP Program topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee reviews CEP subdivision map; requests clearer definitions of 'occupancy paid' and participation

Conservation Advisory Committee · April 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff displayed a GIS CEP map showing subdivisions that have opted into the CEP, fields for occupancy-paid vs unpaid and building-permit status; members asked for clearer legend language and definitions and noted the CEP account balance.

Staff presented a GIS-created CEP subdivision map showing which subdivisions have opted into the conservation and education program (CEP) and explained the colors: tan blocks indicate where building permits have been issued and other colors indicate occupancy-paid, occupancy-unpaid or no-occupancy status. "As you can see, the CEP subdivision map that GIS has put together, it shows, where the subdivisions which have opted into the program are," the staff member said.

Committee members pressed for clearer definitions and a corrected legend. One member noted that the map labels for occupancy status are confusing and asked that the 'no occupancy' and 'occupancy unpaid' categories be combined or relabeled so they reflect whether homes are occupied and therefore paying into the CEP. The chair and staff agreed to update the language on the map and supply definitions.

The chair also reported that the CEP account contains about $20,000 currently and projected additional receipts over the next year; members discussed using either the committee's own funds, a city budget ask, or external grants to launch priority projects.