Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Comprehensive Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board wrestles with consistency between Ancram comprehensive plan and zoning
Summary
Board members debated whether the telecommunications zoning allowance conflicts with the comprehensive plan’s scenic‑protection language; staff counsel said courts require only general consistency and that the town board previously chose to permit the use in the scenic overlay.
Board members spent part of the Feb. 11 work session comparing the town’s comprehensive-plan descriptions of scenic resources with the telecommunications provisions in the zoning code. Several members noted an apparent tension: the plan emphasizes preserving scenic character while a zoning provision explicitly allows telecommunications facilities in the scenic overlay.
Legal staff explained the local-law framework: New York courts require a general consistency between comprehensive plans and zoning, not perfect alignment, and the town board previously amended zoning to permit telecommunications uses in the scenic corridor with stated purposes. That background informed discussion about FEAF question 17 (consistency with community plans). Several board members said they felt the project was consistent with adopted policy as implemented by the town board, and the group coalesced around marking question 17 as 'no' for inconsistency (i.e., consistent).
