Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Bond Election topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

PNGISD bond Proposition A approved by voters; board certifies $75 million measure

Port Neches-Groves Independent School District Board of Trustees · November 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Port Neches-Groves ISD Board of Trustees certified the Nov. 4 bond election on Nov. 13, declaring Proposition A (up to $75 million for facilities and school buses) passed by a margin of 1,568 to 1,375 and adopting Jefferson County returns.

Port Neches-Groves Independent School District voters approved Proposition A on Nov. 4, 2025, and the board formally canvassed and certified the bond results at a Nov. 13 special meeting.

Trustee Scott Bartlett "made a motion to adopt the attached resolution canvassing the results of the November 4, 20205 bond election," which Jake Lefort seconded; the board voted 6-0 to adopt the resolution. The resolution records that Proposition A — authorizing the issuance of up to $75,000,000 in school building bonds and the levy of a tax sufficient to pay principal and interest — passed by a vote of 1,568 FOR to 1,375 AGAINST and includes the early, election-day and absentee vote breakdowns.

The resolution explicitly labels the proposition as a tax increase in the ballot language and lists purpose language for the bonds: designing, constructing, renovating, improving, upgrading, updating, acquiring, and equipping school facilities and purchasing new school buses. The vote breakdown recorded in the resolution shows Early Votes: For 910, Against 765; Absentee Votes: For 4, Against 6; Election Day Votes: For 654, Against 604; Total For 1,568, Total Against 1,375. The board's action adopts the Jefferson County unofficial returns as the basis for certification.

The resolution also finds that notice and open-meeting requirements were met, and it states the resolution is in force and effect from and after its final passage. The board authorized routine ministerial execution steps for the resolution; no additional implementation specifics were recorded at the special meeting.