Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Targets topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission hears that county housing targets are fixed by state tool and market forces will shape outcomes
Summary
Commissioners asked about housing growth numbers; consultant Scott Chesky said the county's housing allocations were produced using Commerce's tool and are fixed without reallocating across jurisdictions, and that market forces and lack of funding will influence where housing—especially middle‑income and supportive housing—actually locates.
A commissioner asked whether the housing allocations shown in the materials could be adjusted in response to recent fire losses and concerns about where middle‑income households will be housed. Scott Chesky said the housing numbers were calculated with a state Commerce tool and are effectively "chiseled in stone" for the county without a county‑wide reallocation process.
Chesky said the draft numbers are focused on new growth in the unincorporated county and do not account for replacement housing tied to disaster recovery. He pointed out that market dynamics favor building market‑rate, higher income units on the county edge and that incentives or gap funding would be necessary to deliver housing affordable to lower‑income brackets.
Commissioners discussed whether satellite social services or land banking could help, and staff noted development opportunities in West Plains and the North Metro area (MeadWorks) that could ultimately host more affordable rentals if supportive services and infrastructure follow. No numeric reallocation was made at the meeting.
