Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Device Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board tweaks NEOLA language on personal communication devices, seeks administrator approval for exceptions
Summary
In reviewing NEOLA policy updates, the board agreed to clarify the personal communication device (PCD) policy to include examples 'but not limited to' and to limit approval for in-class device use to administrators rather than individual teachers, while adding an 'open and active' qualifier for confidentiality.
During the policy packet walkthrough, staff and board members discussed updates to NEOLA language governing personal communication devices (PCDs) and privacy protections.
Staff proposed a broad PCD definition that includes phones, tablets, smartwatches and other web‑enabled devices. Board member Mary asked whether teachers or administrators can approve device use; following discussion the board favored language restricting approval to administrators. The board also requested the device definition read as “examples of PCDs, but not limited to,” so future technologies are covered.
Members raised legal concerns about students’ expectation of confidentiality. Staff and counsel clarified that the phrase “students shall have no expectation of confidentiality” applies when a device is open and active on school property; locked devices would require due process before school staff access content. The board asked staff to refine the wording so it clearly distinguishes visible/open use (no expectation of privacy) from locked devices (subject to legal protections).
The board asked staff to prepare revised draft language and return it for formal consideration.
