Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Attendance Credit Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Monroe board presses district for data on ‘credit awarded’ entries and absentee rules
Summary
Board members questioned why 'credit awarded' (CA) notations appear so frequently and asked staff to produce appeals, grading, and CA-type data after staff reported 1,305 CAs district-wide last year. Members urged clearer documentation of when credits reflect passing proficiency versus administrative notation.
At a special Monroe Public Schools work session on Oct. 28, the board probed how the district’s “credit awarded” (CA) practice interacts with attendance thresholds and grading.
Superintendent Shaw opened the discussion and staff explained that CAs were created to keep students from falling irretrievably behind when they miss large stretches of class time. “The CA was originally designed to hold students accountable for their attendance,” Terry, a district staff member, told the board, noting that Monroe High had 350 students with CAs last year and that there were 1,305 CAs district-wide.
Board members sought clarity on thresholds and timing. Members were told teachers and the attendance team initiate interventions well before the CA threshold: automated calls after individual absences, teacher outreach after three absences, attendance-team contact after six, and a formal attendance intervention meeting at seven absences; appeals and formal review typically happen around nine absences. Board member Darla pressed on whether the process is followed early enough: she said if interventions don’t happen at seven, “we're already failing the student because we're not following our own procedure.”
A central point of contention was what a CA on a transcript actually represents. Some board members read CA as awarding credit without a visible grade; staff responded that teacher gradebooks in PowerSchool continue to record assignment and assessment scores and that a student must meet a 60% proficiency standard to earn credit. “No one is implying anywhere in here that a student receives credit for a course that they do not pass,” Terry said, but board members requested explicit documentation showing whether each CA resulted from credit recovery, testing out, or first-time course completion.
The board directed staff to return with disaggregated data: counts of appeals at the nine-absence stage, CA totals split by school and reason (credit recovery vs. testing out vs. first-time), evidence files showing proficiency thresholds were met (while respecting FERPA), and examples of transcript notation practices. The board agreed to continue the discussion in a future work session after reviewing those materials.
