Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines park-impact fee options and possible housing-cost effects
Summary
City staff presented a statutory park-impact fee assessment and a range of policy options; staff cited $9.5M in park improvements over the last decade and projected $3.7M future needs and gave examples showing potential monthly mortgage impacts in the range of about $3–$12 per unit depending on fee level.
City staff presented the statutory assessment underlying a potential park-impact fee and outlined a range of policy choices for council consideration. The study considered park acreage, population, total improvement value (staff cited roughly $9.5 million in park improvements over the last decade), and future capital projections (about $3.7 million), and used those inputs to generate a maximum calculable fee; council may set a lower fee if it chooses.
Staff explained the fee is not meant for maintenance or routine staffing but to address capital improvements tied to new development. Noel highlighted policy options (full fee or scaled options at 75%, 50% or 25%) and showed example impacts for sample projects: under some scenarios staff estimated mortgage impacts of roughly $3 up to $12 per month depending on unit type and fee level. "The assessment must have a rational connection back to growth and the actual infrastructure," Noel told the council, and staff noted council will need to decide both fee level and whether to require land dedication or payment in lieu in specific service areas.
Council members asked for clarification on allowable uses and implementation; staff and the city attorney said the ordinance sets a maximum supported by the study and the council can set any level at or below that maximum.
