Get email alerts on the Property Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Polk County board accepts assessor recommendations on 70 protests; 26 parcels' values lowered
Summary
At a July 21, 2026 meeting in Osceola the Polk County Board of Equalization voted to accept the county assessor’s recommendations on 70 valuation protests — lowering assessments on 26 parcels, leaving 43 unchanged and recording one withdrawal. Vice Chairman Mike Boss moved the motion; Boruch seconded it and the motion carried.
The Polk County Board of Equalization convened July 21, 2026 in Osceola and approved the county assessor’s recommendations after reviewing 70 filed valuation protests.
Vice Chairman Mike Boss moved that the board accept the Assessor’s recommendations on all protests; the motion was seconded by Boruch and carried on a roll-call vote (Boss, aye; Boruch, aye). Assessor Krance was present for the review. The board noted that one protest had been withdrawn after filing with the County Clerk.
The board recorded that valuations were lowered for 26 parcels and left unchanged for 43 parcels. The minutes list parcel-level outcomes across multiple subdivisions and rural tracts, with several entries specifying new valuations (for example, Jeffrey L. Kroese’s tract was lowered to $129,605 and Frontier Cooperative Co. had two lowered valuations entered: $89,125 and $35,440). The clerk prefaced the list with "The following action was taken." The meeting convened at 1:00 p.m. and adjourned at 2:05 p.m.
County Clerk Debra S. Girard signed the minutes as approved alongside Vice Chairman Mike Boss. The board also noted that a current copy of the Open Meetings Act was posted in the meeting room as required.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
