Council moves to executive session over pending or imminent litigation
Summary
Council voted to enter an executive session under Ohio Revised Code section 121.22(G)(3) to confer with the city attorney about disputes that are the subject of pending or imminent court action; required staff and outside counsel were listed to remain for the closed session.
Sunbury City Council voted on Aug. 5 to enter an executive session under Ohio Revised Code section 121.22(G)(3) for conferences with the city's attorney concerning disputes that are the subject of pending or imminent court action. The clerk made the motion and the roll call recorded seven ayes.
The clerk said the session would include City Manager Daryl P. Hennessy, assistant city manager Sean (surname not specified), and outside counsel Jesse Schamp from Frost Brown Todd; staff noted the public would exit and there would be no further business taken afterward. Council later reconvened, took a final roll call and adjourned the meeting.
No substantive discussion or legal details from the executive session were disclosed in open session.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
