Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Adus topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Homeowner seeks backyard ADU near Wakefield rail-trail wetland; commissioners plan site visit
Summary
A Wakefield homeowner described a proposed 783 sq ft, single-story accessory dwelling unit sited behind the house near a rail-trail and wetland; the commission requested erosion controls and scheduled a site visit to confirm setbacks and drainage.
John, a homeowner applying for a Request for Determination of Applicability at 123 Vernon Street, described a single-story, roughly 783-square-foot ADU sited at the rear of his lot, toward an abandoned rail right-of-way and a bordering wetland. He told the Wakefield Conservation Commission the planned footprint fits by-right setback requirements and that utilities would be run from the main house, possibly using a macerating pump for sewer if needed. "We were looking to just, make a small house in the backyard that they could live in," John said, explaining the purpose was to provide space for his daughter and granddaughter.
Commissioners asked detailed questions about topography, construction methods and runoff management. Chair Trevor noted the lot slopes to the rail trail and then down again to the wetland and asked whether the ADU would be within the town setback; staff member Ethan confirmed the structure appears to be more than 78 feet from the wetland but advised a formal survey and topo would be needed. Commissioner Eleanor recommended simple erosion controls and gutters that route roof runoff on-site: "The only thing I would recommend ... is having some sort of drainage done to ensure that the roof runoff remains on the property and isn't just discharging downhill," she said.
John said he expects to use a pier foundation to reduce heavy equipment needs and estimated roughly a dozen piers, and that most excavation material would be stockpiled for reuse rather than bringing in fill. "I was planning on building it myself," he said, adding that using piers would limit large equipment on the slope. Commissioners noted tree removal could be minimal but asked John to stake the proposed footprint so members can see exact locations during a site visit.
The commission agreed to coordinate a site visit from a small team to avoid open-meeting conflicts and asked the applicant to place stakes showing the proposed ADU location. The visit was tentatively scheduled for Thursday at 06:30, with the commission planning to follow up with any recommended conditions (for example, erosion controls and measures to prevent roof runoff from discharging into the wetland).
