Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rankin SB7 RIF committee declines to move teachers from Group 2 into Group 3

Rankin School District #98 - Board of Education · August 12, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At an Aug. 12, 2025 SB 7 RIF Committee meeting, members considered but did not agree to criteria that would move certain teachers from Group 2 to Group 3 and therefore left the default requirements of Section 24-12(b) of the School Code in effect.

The SB 7 reduction-in-force (RIF) joint committee for Rankin School District 98 met Aug. 12, 2025, and decided not to adopt criteria that would reassign teachers from Group 2 into Group 3 under the statutory sequence-of-dismissal framework. Dr. Matt Gordon called the meeting to order at 11:43 a.m., and the committee worked through the questionnaire provided by the regional office of education.

When the committee reached the item asking whether a teacher whose last two performance evaluations included a 'Needs Improvement' and either a 'Proficient' or 'Excellent' should be excluded from Group 2 and placed into Group 3, members "considered the foregoing, but did not reach agreement on the matter, therefore, the otherwise applicable requirements of Section 24-12(b) of the School Code apply." The minutes record that "the committee agreed not to move teachers from group 2 to group 3." This action means the default statutory criteria will govern any future sequence-of-dismissal lists unless the committee later adopts different written criteria.

The decision preserves the school code’s baseline protections and procedures; committee members acknowledged their right to review performance-rating lists and seek additional analysis if they suspect a disproportionate number of lower ratings among longer-serving staff. The meeting adjourned at 11:47 a.m. after a unanimous motion to adjourn made by Lisa Thompson and seconded by Amy Galletti.

Next steps: the committee completed the ROE questionnaire as required; any member may request the anonymized performance-rating lists within the statutory timelines noted in the minutes.