Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Property Tax topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Tax administrator outlines January 2027 revaluation; officials warn values, appeals will follow

Burke County Board of Commissioners · August 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Burke County tax administrator Travis Isaacs presented the county's revaluation process for January 2027, explaining data sources (qualified sales, MLS, Marshall & Swift), valuation approaches, quality metrics (median ratio, coefficient of dispersion), planned schedule, public review and appeals. Officials flagged that revaluation can shift tax burdens even if the board seeks revenue neutrality.

Tax Administrator Travis Isaacs told commissioners Aug. 6 the county will conduct a revaluation effective January 2027 to reset property market values across Burke County, citing a state letter and sales-ratio triggers that require a reappraisal within three years.

Isaacs described using three approaches to valuation — sales comparison, income and cost — and said about 70% of the process relies on verified, arms‑length sales. He explained how the county will develop a schedule of values (building costs per square foot, depreciation grades, land schedules) and conduct field and office reviews before issuing notices. He summarized quality-control metrics the state requires, including a target median ratio and acceptable coefficient of dispersion, and said the county will post schedules for public review followed by a public hearing and a 30‑day appeal window.

Commissioners asked about field staff identification (Isaacs said vehicles and hangers identify county appraisers) and how unusual sales (for example, a $1.5 million home amid $50–$80k houses) are handled; Isaacs said outliers are reviewed and not automatically applied across a market area. He also confirmed that adopting new values and adopting a revenue‑neutral tax rate can still produce winners and losers at the parcel level, and he urged property owners to review notices and use the informal appeal process if they find errors.

The board received the presentation (no vote to adopt values took place at this meeting); Isaacs said the task force will refine schedule proposals and return to the board with draft schedules for public review in coming months.