Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members’ ties to Heritage Wind prompt recusal questions at Barre meeting
Summary
Several board members raised whether ties to Heritage Wind require recusal from a subdivision decision; staff said it will investigate and return with guidance. The potential recusals could deprive the board of a quorum and delay action.
During discussion of a subdivision application, a committee member (speaker 1) raised potential conflicts, saying "There are people on this board who are involved with Heritage Wing, if paid by Heritage" and asked whether those relationships require recusal from the matter.
Other board members and staff debated whether the company itself should apply or whether the landowner’s application and disclosure were sufficient. Planning staff (speaker 6) said they would "look into the recusal question" and provide a firmer answer at a future meeting. Several members warned that if multiple recusals were required the board might lack a quorum and the matter would be postponed.
Why it matters: recusals affect who can participate in official decisions and whether a body has sufficient members to act; the board agreed not to vote on the subdivision until staff confirms recusal rules and the matter’s administrative form is clarified.
What’s next: staff will review conflict-of-interest rules and report back; the board may postpone action if recusals reduce quorum.
