Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Midvale council weighs tougher enforcement for repeat code violators, cautions about criminal route
Summary
City staff outlined options to tighten enforcement for repeat code violators, including administrative citations and liens; the city attorney warned that criminal charges can have severe collateral consequences for individuals seeking employment.
City staff presented an overview of Midvale’s code enforcement process and possible updates at the July 15 meeting. Adam Olsen said staff had reviewed fee structures and the escalation path for repeat noncompliance, noting some municipalities use liens or city‑led cleanups to address persistent violations.
Garrett Wilcox, Midvale’s city attorney, cautioned against defaulting to criminal prosecution, saying that "pursuing criminal charges is an extreme response, particularly for individuals applying for jobs." He explained the legal difference between notices of violation, administrative citations (which can carry immediate fines but are appealable), and criminal citations that would involve the courts. Matt Dahl proposed keeping the existing structure while adding "more teeth" through a targeted strategy for repeat offenders; council members agreed that clearer definitions and escalation steps were needed.
Public‑works Director Glen Kennedy warned that if the city performs cleanups on private property, strong liability waivers and outside contractors would be necessary to avoid exposing city employees to risk. The council directed staff to draft a strategy focused on repeat offenders and to bring proposed code revisions back for consideration.
