Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permitting Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Calvert County launches online dashboard and fast-track options to speed residential permits
Summary
County planning officials said recent updates to the county's IPS land-management software, a new public dashboard and a planned fast-track process for simple permits have cut review times and will give applicants more visibility into average review cycles.
Get email alerts on the Permitting Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Calvert County planning officials on Thursday described recent software and process changes they say are already shortening permit-review times and will give residents more information about expected wait times. Jason Brinkley, Director of Planning and Zoning, said the county’s land-management system (IPS) received a near-comprehensive update to better route reviews, send alerts and track inspections.
Brinkley said the county saw more online submissions in 2025 than in person and that the system improvements have accelerated trades reviews. "At times, it was taking a few weeks to review electrical permits... now we're down to less than a week on average," Brinkley said. He said the county is adding front‑end checklists to reduce resubmission cycles and is finalizing a fast-track process for simple residential permits such as decks and sheds that could allow same‑day issuance in qualifying cases.
The county also said it published a public dashboard showing how many permits were reviewed in recent months and (soon) average review times by permit type. Brinkley urged residents to use pre‑concept meetings—either in person or via an online appointment feature—to identify potential roadblocks before spending on design work. The county expects the dashboard to display February and later months' data and to evolve as the system is refined.
Officials said the changes do not change legal standards for approval but are intended to improve customer service and reduce backlog. They asked for public feedback on the fast‑track pilot and reminded residents that unique site conditions (critical areas, wells/septic, historic resources) may still require fuller reviews.
