Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Boards And Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
McKinney council debates giving each member a nomination slot for key boards
Summary
Council members spent much of the work session discussing a proposed change to the boards and commissions appointment policy that would let each councilmember nominate candidates for seats on seven‑member boards; council asked staff to draft language and to pilot the process for the EDC and CDC.
Get email alerts on the Boards And Commissions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City Secretary Empress Sharon reviewed the city’s existing boards and commissions policy and the schedule for preferencing and appointments, then the council debated a proposal to change how members are selected for certain boards.
“Once appointed, members all must complete training and obey the laws of the city, as well as the state and beyond,” Empress Sharon said during the policy overview. A council member proposed allowing each councilmember to nominate one person for seven‑member boards, with the full council voting on the slate; supporters framed the proposal as a way to improve district representation and accountability.
Opponents urged caution, arguing some boards—especially those that handle significant financial matters—need highly qualified appointees. Several council members suggested piloting the change for the Economic Development Corporation (EDC) and Community Development Corporation (CDC) only, then reviewing results. Empress Sharon told the council staff would prepare draft policy language, solicit hypothetical nominations to show how the change would play out, and return with amendments and timing options; she said the preferencing meeting is scheduled for Aug. 18 and appointments for Aug. 25, with new terms to take effect on Jan. 1 unless the council decides otherwise.
Council members debated whether to make the change immediate or phase it in (options discussed included Oct. 1 versus Jan. 1 start dates), how to handle midterm incumbents and alternates, and whether application deadlines would need to be extended. The council directed staff to prepare a draft policy and a picture of the hypothetical appointments so members can see which incumbents would remain and how many slots would open under the proposed approach.
