Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners weigh two vendor approaches for county facility assessment
Summary
The board discussed capital improvement planning options: SitelogiQ’s ongoing assessment model (percentage-based) versus Contegrity’s one-time assessment proposal at $38,000 plus $2,500 reimbursables; no decision was made.
Get email alerts on the Capital Planning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners reviewed two vendor approaches for county facility assessment and ongoing capital improvement planning. SitelogiQ offered an ongoing assessment service that would charge by directing or leading upcoming projects (a percentage of project costs); Contegrity proposed a one-time building assessment priced at $38,000 with $2,500 in reimbursable expenses and optional hourly services.
Board members discussed both approaches but did not take final action at the June 23 meeting; minutes indicate further investigation of the two varied services is warranted before deciding. The Contegrity price and reimbursable estimate are recorded in the minutes and are the primary quantitative details reported.
