Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Design board gives detailed guidance, asks for revised details on 153 Van Damme addition
Summary
The board did not grant final approval for a proposed side addition at 153 Van Damme but provided specific guidance on roof pitch, siding material, window configuration and trim; applicant was asked to return with scaled detail drawings and material mock-ups for the Oct. 9 meeting.
Erin Maciel, project designer for the 153 Van Damme application, presented updated drawings and a historic photograph that shows the house originally had a front gable roof. The applicant proposes a narrow side addition, revised rooflines, new windows (one-over-one, not divided light), and LP siding (a lower-cost alternative to cement board). Maciel said the intent is to restore historic proportions while adding practical drainage and a modest second-floor space.
Board members carefully reviewed the proposed siding materials and recommended the applicant provide enlarged detail drawings and a physical mock-up. Members discussed trade-offs between cement/fiber cement panels (more durable, fire-rated, smooth finish) and LP/particle‑board siding (cheaper but possibly discontinued and less durable). The board requested enlarged window and cornice details, a resolution of siding reveal/exposure, separation of ganged windows, and consideration of a higher roof pitch on the addition to avoid an awkward 'flat' appearance. The board asked that the applicant return with the requested details two weeks prior to the Oct. 9 meeting so the item can be placed on the next agenda.
Board feedback included this practical direction from a member: "If you just blow up those details in a scale drawing... blow up the window trim, the cornice, the corner board." The board did not grant mass and scale approval pending the more detailed drawings and a potential mock-up.
