Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Election Process topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council debates appointment versus special election to fill vacancies
Summary
Council members clashed over whether to appoint interim members or request a special election to fill council vacancies, with disagreements on timing, charter requirements and whether the Board of Elections should be asked to prepare a calendar.
Council members spent much of the meeting debating how to fill current and impending vacancies on the council, with Commissioner Moran arguing the council must act to request a special election while others urged seeking Board of Elections guidance first. Moran said the council’s authority includes asking the Board of Elections to schedule a special election and warned that asking the board is the council’s responsibility: "It is rather an action by the council that's required," he said.
The mayor and other members raised concerns about timing and statutory windows, noting a 90‑day ballot access window and the potential impact on military voters if an election were scheduled too close to November 5. Commissioner Cole suggested a dual approach: ask the Board of Elections for guidance and meanwhile appoint a committee to develop an appointment process. The council agreed to bring the issue back at the next meeting with additional information from the Board of Elections and a proposed committee process.
