Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Bicycle Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Task force asks staff to check bike‑lane and turn‑lane interactions, coordinate with VDOT
Summary
Members asked whether showing bike lanes adjacent to turn lanes could create conflict zones; staff agreed to consult FCDOT/design leads and noted VDOT standards will constrain cross‑section choices. The task force discussed removing turn lanes in some urban sections to improve safety and walkability.
Task‑force members raised concerns that bike lanes placed next to turn lanes can create conflict points where turning vehicles cross a cyclist’s path. A Springfield representative urged staff to examine current guidance and avoid designs that increase hazard points; the participant noted that "we have class 3 ebikes now going 28 miles an hour" and expressed concern about fatality risk.
Tom and other staff said the draft cross‑sections are highly conceptual and that VDOT standards typically govern roadway geometry. "I'd be careful to put notes like that in the plan because Right. Generally, we have to follow vDOT standards," Tom said, and added staff would consult active‑transportation and capital‑project designers to refine recommendations. Several members urged exploring ways to limit turn lanes within the urban core, citing prior success negotiating lane removal with VDOT on other corridors, and asked staff to add clearer text on how the plan will pursue those changes.
Staff agreed to follow up with FCDOT and VDOT contacts, consider mid‑block cross‑section options that de‑emphasize turn lanes in the urban core, and possibly address turn‑lane policy in the text rather than in cross‑section graphics.
