Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Audit topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Audit of draft articles and provenance
Summary
Automated audit against style, identification, chronology and content rules; lists detected issues and recommended fixes.
Spelling: []
Clarity: []
Chronology: []
Framing: []
Misinformation: []
Misidentification: [{"type":"speaker-label-ambiguity","description":"The transcript labels the same voice (speaker 1) doing both roll call and the Forest Hills Foundation presentation; transcript introduces 'Miss Gilliard' immediately before speaker 1's foundation remarks, but speaker 1 earlier performed clerk roll-call duties. This raises ambiguity about whether the clerk and the presenter are the same person or whether speaker-labeling in the transcript shifts mid-meeting.","severity":"medium"}]
Out_of_context: []
Quantitative precision: [{"type":"approximate_numbers","description":"Several counts are reported as approximate in the transcript (e.g., 'approximately 700 staff members', 'about 15,000 alumni contacts'). Articles either used the exact phrasing or estimated affected-population ranges; ensure phrasing retains 'approximately' or 'about' as in transcript.","severity":"medium"}]
Process clarity: []
Context clarity: []
Agency clarity: []
Question emphasis: []
Omission: []
Bias: []
Duplicate: []
