Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council approves Hubbard Natural Area trail and parking, 3–1; lighting dispute divides members and neighbors

South Burlington City Council · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended public comment and council debate over wildlife and safety, council voted 3–1 to award the Hubbard Natural Area construction contract on base bid (wired lighting included); one councilor opposed removing lights without a DRB administrative finding.

The council considered the Hubbard (formerly Underwood) Natural Area project—an ADA‑accessible 10‑foot paved path, small pause area with benches and trees, and an 18‑space parking lot with five accessible stalls. Staff said nine bids were received with a low base bid under engineer estimate and recommended awarding to the low bidder with the base bid (wired lighting) rather than the solar alternate.

Councilors debated whether to remove the low‑level, downcast lighting to protect wildlife and preserve the natural character of the 60‑acre park versus retaining the approved amenities to ensure equitable access, safety and to honor a prior extensive public process. Opponents of lights argued the fixtures would alter habitat and cost roughly $60–90k, while supporters said lights allow safer access at dawn/dusk and reflect the community‑vetted plan. Planning staff cautioned that removing or reconfiguring lighting could require Development Review Board review if the change is substantive.

After hearing public testimony both for and against lights, the council moved to award the contract on the base bid (wired lighting included). The motion passed 3–1 with Councilor Smith recorded as the lone dissent. Staff were authorized to execute the contract and may use an administrative change order to delete lighting only if such a change qualifies for administrative review under DRB rules.