Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Rulemaking Wetlands topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

EPC adopts targeted rule revisions to wetland basis of review, clarifies cumulative impact and living‑shoreline guidance

Hillsborough County Environmental Protection Commission · August 15, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission approved amendments to chapters 3 and 5 of the EPC basis of review to clarify cumulative‑impact analysis, expand living‑shoreline guidance, add limited exemptions (e.g., renourishment, geotechnical investigations), and cap miscellaneous‑activity seawall replacement impacts at 500 square feet under MAIWs.

At the Aug. 15 meeting the Environmental Protection Commission adopted targeted revisions to the agency's basis of review for wetland permitting. Staff said the changes were intended to clarify how cumulative impacts are considered, align language with state DEP guidance, expand living‑shoreline criteria and create limited exemptions for maintenance of previously permitted living shorelines and for geotechnical investigations and utility pole replacements.

Dessa Clock, Wetlands Division permitting supervisor, said the amendments "focus on addressing cumulative impacts" and incorporate language from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection to provide consistency for applicants. Staff emphasized that miscellaneous activities and wetlands (MAIWs) are projects of nominal consequence that may not require mitigation; the revision limits seawall replacement impacts under MAIWs to no more than 500 square feet of wetland or other surface waters when wetland has developed landward of an existing seawall.

Commissioners raised questions about mitigation banking and whether credits purchased outside the county could undermine local watershed protections. Director Michael Lynch said the rules are designed to encourage basin‑area mitigation and added that state law can preempt local restrictions that prevent use of out‑of‑county banks when specific credit types (for example mangrove) are unavailable locally. Commission counsel and staff noted the amendments provide additional criteria for explaining benefits when mitigation is proposed outside the basin.

The commission voted 6–0 to adopt the proposed rule amendments and authorized staff to correct typographical errors in the final rule text.