Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the I275 Widening topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents, CAC and board spar over I‑275 capacity language; motion to remove it fails
Summary
Public commenters and the Citizens Advisory Committee urged removal of the word “capacity” from the I‑275 North of Hillsborough to Bears item, citing past neighborhood harm and inadequate public notice; the board debated process and rejected a motion to strike the language 7–6.
Dozens of residents from Seminole Heights, Tampa Heights and other neighborhoods told the Hillsborough County Transportation Planning Organization on Wednesday that adding “capacity” to the I‑275 North of Hillsborough to Bears project would reopen the door to highway widening that would harm homes, businesses and neighborhood cohesion. Rick Fernandez, president of the Tampa Heights Civic Association, told the board: “You have failed to follow your own rules, ladies and gentlemen. Please fix this.”
The Citizens Advisory Committee had recommended striking the term “capacity” by a 10–1 vote after public testimony; CAC Chair Rick Fernandez incorporated that opinion into his report to the board. Councilwoman Hertek moved to remove the capacity language from Table 2 (the priority‑projects list) and to bring the item back at a publicly noticed October hearing so the public could weigh in again. After extended debate over procedure and whether the change was germane to the draft LRTP item, the motion went to roll call and failed 7–6. The board repeatedly emphasized that the motion would not commit funding; staff and several board members said adding or removing a project at this stage mainly affects whether it appears as an unfunded needs item for future study.
The public comments and CAC objections centered on process, historic community impacts from interstate construction, and a desire to prioritize transit alternatives rather than highway capacity. Multiple residents asked that non‑elected members on the TIP/TPO board serve only in advisory roles; that issue was raised but not resolved at this meeting. The board did not adopt any change to the I‑275 line item at today's session; members directed staff to continue public outreach and bring relevant draft documents to the October adoption hearing.
