Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Standards topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission pushes to clarify PUD architectural standards and require R‑3 materials for residential blocks
Summary
Commissioners pressed for more precise architectural standards in the PUD text — objecting to vague phrases such as 'residential village character' — and requested that the PUD incorporate the town’s R‑3 exterior material requirements (a roughly 75% masonry/material threshold) and a clear height limit.
Several commissioners raised concerns that portions of the proposed PUD text were too vague on architectural standards and exterior materials, and recommended the town’s R‑3 exterior material standards be required for the residential portions of the PUD.
One commissioner said a clause in Section 5 that the “building shall be designed to reflect a residential village character” is open to broad interpretation and urged specific standards be written into the PUD text. “It seems like a thing that could be interpreted in many different ways,” the commissioner said. Staff agreed and recommended amending the PUD text to reference R‑3 material standards (the staff noted the town often treats hardy/fiber cement board and stone veneer as meeting the threshold) and to set a numeric height limit to avoid ambiguity.
Petitioner accepted those clarifications and said the conceptual elevations submitted already show fiber cement and stone veneer materials that would be compatible with the requested R‑3 threshold.
