Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District winter data shows stagnant proficiency and achievement gaps; administration emphasizes coaching and curriculum consistency
Summary
The district's winter data report presented March 18 and referenced April 1 shows stagnation and regression in FastBridge reading and math, persistent demographic disparities, and a third-grade case study that improved aMath proficiency from ~65% to 76%; administration recommended deeper professional development, consistent SAVVAS implementation, and data-driven instruction.
District leaders presented a comprehensive winter data report that highlighted overall stagnation in FastBridge reading and math scores, persistent disparities by demographic group, and examples of effective practice. The report said White students scored higher on average, while multilingual learners and students receiving special education services were disproportionately in the lowest proficiency percentiles.
Superintendent Corneille and Executive Director of Academics Hope Fagerland framed the report as evidence for continuing the district's Effective Instruction (EI) work and increasing consistent implementation of the SAVVAS literacy curriculum. They pointed to a third-grade team at Wilshire Park that used collaborative, data-informed practices and diagnostic tools (IXL, FastBridge aMath, unit assessments) to raise aMath proficiency for the team from roughly 65% in the fall to 76% in the winter.
The presentation included specific board student-success metrics with 2028 targets (for example, raising 3rd-grade MCA reading proficiency from 49% to 70% and 3rd-grade MCA math from 61% to 80%). Administration emphasized slow, systemic change and coaching for teachers; a quote repeated in packet materials attributed to an external superintendent framed the work: "Please note that, in order to do this work, it's like turning the course of an aircraft carrier ' you have to do it very, very slowly." The board discussed next steps for professional development, expectations for consistent curriculum use, and measurable student success goals.
The district also noted student-reported engagement declines on Panorama surveys for grades 6-12 and recommended continued focus on data-to-pedagogy transfer. Administration will return with implementation details to support fidelity of curriculum and coaching practices.
