Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Technology And Privacy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council pauses capital-program vote to get more detail on proposed police drone unit
Summary
During the capital program hearing the council heard questions about a proposed police drone program—uses, data retention, and third-party access—and asked staff to circulate a county policy and discuss the issue further in workshop before any vote.
The council opened a public hearing on the city's 2027-2031 capital program and received no immediate public speakers, but a councilmember raised questions submitted by a resident about a proposed police drone program included in the plan. The questions sought clarity about the drones' uses and about how data would be stored and shared.
A councilmember asked: “So what are the drones being used for? Where, is that data going?” Staff and the mayor deferred technical privacy details to the police chief but said they would circulate a county policy that limits permitted uses and prohibits sharing with ICE and other federal enforcement in certain circumstances. The mayor said the county's analysis and real-time crime intelligence policy restricts drone and camera uses to violent-crime and serious-investigation contexts and prohibits general surveillance and sharing with immigration authorities.
Council directed staff to include the drone-policy materials and any retention/storage details in written materials and to take up the drone question in workshop before voting on the capital program. The council closed the public hearing on the capital plan pending those clarifications and indicated that a formal vote could occur on July 6 or be deferred to a later meeting if more review is needed.
