Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sidewalk Project topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Kincaid trustees table federal Safe Routes to School sidewalk project after engineers present $416,823 estimate

Village of Kincaid Board of Trustees · November 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Chastain & Associates presented a revised Safe Routes to School (SRTS) sidewalk plan with an engineers estimate of $416,823; the state would cover $250,000, leaving the village responsible for roughly $166,000. Trustees voted to table the item for committee review.

Daniel Luka of Chastain & Associates told the Village of Kincaid board that the federally funded Safe Routes to School sidewalk project began with a 2021 design but has been reduced to meet budget and federal standards. He said the project totals about 22,079.9 square feet and that an original engineers estimate was $407,904 before reductions and observation costs were included.

"You have side observation budget of fifty thousand dollars for the thirty-five working days," Luka said, describing federal reporting and on‑site observation requirements that raise project costs and lengthen closeout. He explained the state will pay up to $250,000 of the award and the village would pay overage once that maximum is reached. After a 20% reduction to scope, Luka said the combined construction and observation estimate was $416,823, leaving the village responsible for about $166,000 after the $250,000 SRTS award.

Mayor Tony Pezze and trustees questioned how much the village had already spent on design; Luka said design billing totaled about $80,000 and redesigns pushed the total to roughly $97,000 to date. Trustees discussed whether to proceed now, hire local contractors without state funding, or hold the design for a future funding round; Luka noted an extended pause risks losing the current funding and may require refreshed environmental and historical studies.

Trustee Nelson moved to table the project to allow a committee to meet and review options; Jaeger seconded and the motion passed unanimously. The board did not adopt a funding commitment; next steps are committee review and return to the board for a vote.