Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Minoa planners weigh but do not require sprinkler retrofit for new upholstery use
Summary
The Planning Board reviewed a Code Enforcement note and Fire Chief comment about a possible sprinkler retrofit for 91 Hulbert St. but found no evidence in the record to mandate retrofitting; the board asked for any required code citations and left permit determinations to Code Enforcement.
During its May 14 review of the site plan for 91 Hulbert Street the Village of Minoa Planning Board examined whether the change of use to an upholstery shop would trigger a requirement to retrofit the building with an automatic sprinkler system.
The board noted the Code Enforcement Office report referenced a possible sprinkler requirement but did not include specific code citations or factual analysis; the chair said he spoke with the Code Enforcement Official before the meeting but no additional documentation was provided. The Fire Chief, as recorded in the minutes, told the board that "based on the facts presented, it's unclear whether the building would be required to be retrofitted with a sprinkler system." The board concluded there was no evidence in the record that the proposed use materially increased the fire hazard compared with prior commercial occupancies in the plaza and that the tenant's square footage alone did not automatically trigger a higher hazard classification.
The board's approach was to accept the applicant's representations regarding operations — including that no spray painting, welding, fuel-system work, or storage of flammable materials would occur — while directing that any construction or permit needs be handled through the Village Code Enforcement Office. The minutes note the applicant had previously arranged temporary off-site storage for larger marine projects if needed and that customer vehicles are typically on-site for three to five days while work is completed.
