Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Landscape Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners begin debate on stronger tree and buffer rules for new development
Summary
A commissioner proposed changes to landscaping rules to require native species, larger buffers and a higher tree‑retention ratio for new subdivisions; the panel discussed incentives versus regulation and whether requirements should apply to new developments only.
After the Forestdale preliminary‑plat discussion, commissioners spent an extended portion of the meeting discussing proposed changes to the city’s landscape/screening requirements for new development.
A commissioner who led the discussion proposed removing an exception for single‑family development, creating a separate residential landscape standard, increasing buffers (15 feet or more in some residential contexts), and adopting a 2‑for‑1 credit for retained trees (the proposer said this would incentivize keeping mature trees). “What I would establish would be a 2 for 1,” the commissioner said when describing tree‑retention credits.
Other commissioners debated whether stronger landscaping rules would make housing more expensive or whether incentives would be a better approach. Several commissioners supported requiring native species, limiting unsightly chain‑link screening for commercial properties, and asking developers to identify specific species to be planted so the commission can check whether they are native. Staff and commissioners also discussed practical exceptions for small lots and the cost of variance applications.
