Get email alerts on the Zoning Density topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Intern recommends targeted density corridors in Cobb but cites state law limits
Summary
Jeremy Gutecks recommended zoning denser corridors (for multiplexes, townhomes) such as South Cobb Drive and areas near Barrett Parkway to address the "missing middle," but said limitations under OCGA mean affordability requirements would have to be voluntary.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Density topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jeremy Gutecks, a Hampton–Sydney College student interning with District 2, urged selective increases in residential density along existing corridors rather than blanket zoning changes countywide. "So, like, South Cobb Drive could be a good area and kind of connecting back to Elsa's project with the Town Center Mall that goes by Barrett Parkway," he said, recommending allowing duplexes, townhomes and other multiplexes by right in targeted areas.
Gutecks also noted a legal constraint: he referred to an OCGA provision (he said he listed the exact citation in his brief) that, in his reading, prevents the county from mandating specific affordability requirements, which would limit some zoning tools to voluntary programs rather than mandatory set‑asides. He argued the county could still promote redevelopment by formalizing development-bond processes and selecting corridors where existing infrastructure can support higher density.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

