Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Background Checks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board scraps town-run vetting for shelters, opts to require applicant verification
Summary
After extended debate, the board rejected language making the police department the primary reviewer of shelter staff and volunteers and moved toward requiring organizations to conduct background checks and provide signed verification at their own cost.
A central point of contention in the ordinance workshop was section 17, which in its original form required that "all staff, volunteers, and individuals involved in the operation of the homeless shelter shall be subject to review by the Skowhegan Police Department prior to working at the facility." Members raised legal and practical objections to that requirement, worrying it would place an administrative burden on the police and expose the town to liability if reviews were later challenged.
Committee member (S7) said standard practice in other institutions is to have the organization perform checks and document certifications; S7 recommended a model that would require evidence of completed background checks and relevant staff training (first aid, Narcan, biohazard handling) but leave the mechanics of vetting to the applicant. Chair (S3) and several others supported a "strike and replace" approach to remove town-responsibility language and require applicant-submitted verification. The board instructed staff to replace mandatory town-conducted vetting with a provision requiring organizations to present signed verification that background checks and certifications have been completed at their expense.
