Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Meeting Actions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

At a glance: Commission actions March 9 — CDBG recommendation, Marguerite continuation, Savers approval

Mission Viejo Planning and Transportation Commission · March 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On March 9 the Planning & Transportation Commission recommended the FY 2026–27 CDBG action plan to the council, continued the Marguerite parking lot amendment to April 13 for further study and neighborhood outreach, and approved a minor modification for Savers/Value Village at Mission Viejo Village Center.

Key actions taken by the Mission Viejo Planning & Transportation Commission at its March 9, 2026 meeting:

• CDBG action plan: The commission voted to recommend approval of the FY 2026–27 Community Development Block Grant action plan and authorized submission to HUD (staff had estimated a $369,000 allocation and cited $171,359 in carryover). Motion to move the item was made and seconded; the motion carried on roll call.

• Marguerite Aquatics parking (PMM22026‑003): Staff presented a concept for two new parking lots (Lot A: 52 spaces; Lot B: 95 spaces). After extensive public comment raising safety and circulation concerns about proposed Lot B access to Via Santa Clara, the commission continued the item to April 13 and directed staff to study access alternatives, meet with neighbors, and return with refined circulation options.

• Savers (PDashMM2025‑0008): The commission approved a minor modification permitting exterior remodel and a donation entrance for Savers/Value Village at 27142 La Paz (replacement of Big Lots); applicant said the donation area will be staffed during business hours and cleared each morning.

Procedural note: motions and approvals were recorded as passed in the meeting record but specific numeric roll call tallies were not included in the transcript excerpts.