Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planner outlines zoning rewrite that adds agricultural residential district and short-term rental rules

Walhalla City Council (committee meetings) · August 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An Appalachian Council planner summarized broad changes to Walhalla's draft zoning ordinance, including a new residential agricultural district, reduced height limits in office-commercial areas, added landscaping and parking standards, and a short-term rental section that will draw further discussion.

Jeffrey Gilbo of the Appalachian Council presented a broad, committee-level overview of proposed changes to Walhalla's zoning ordinance, emphasizing clarity, updated definitions and more flexible development tools. Gilbo said the rewrite adds a new residential agricultural district to accommodate farm- and roadside-produce uses, divides the multifamily district to allow lower-density options, and reduces the maximum height in the office-commercial district from four stories to 2.5 "because it's a very neighborhood centric district." He also said the draft includes a new flexible review district (FRD) to permit locally tailored projects and a set of landscaping and parking standards meant to protect single-family neighbors.

The draft would also add a short-term rental standards section and clarify sign regulations, such as limiting political signs on city property and public rights-of-way. Gilbo flagged that some items (for example, uses already covered by other ordinance language) were left unchanged and that legal questions—particularly those touching free-speech or constitutional issues—should be vetted by the city attorney. Committee members asked clarifying questions about conditional uses (including tattoo parlors in a limited industrial context), off-premise advertising restrictions, and whether the new rules would allow or restrict certain businesses on Main Street. No vote was taken; the item will move to council readings with changes to be made before first or second reading as requested by the committee.