Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors split as hundreds weigh in on Waites Wharf hotel and wedding venue
Summary
Dozens of residents and business owners testified during a multi‑hour public comment period about the Waites Wharf redevelopment; opponents cited traffic, parking and neighborhood scale while supporters praised waterfront repairs, maritime access and potential economic benefits.
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning Board allotted a lengthy public‑comment period for the Waites Wharf redevelopment and heard a mix of opposition and support from residents, business owners and stakeholders.
Opponents emphasized traffic safety on narrow one‑way streets, insufficient parking for a hotel/restaurant/wedding venue, loss of historic neighborhood character, and potential downstream impacts of larger daytime traffic. ‘‘The proposed development is just too big,’’ one resident said, arguing repeated denials in earlier proceedings reflected legitimate concerns. Several commenters pointed to Lower Thames Street’s narrow geometry and frequent pedestrian conflicts and asked for stricter event limits and a guarantee the proposed gate would not be misused as routine traffic access.
Supporters and some local business owners said the project will revitalize a low‑use stretch of waterfront, build a water‑taxi stop and harbor‑walk improvements, and repair wharf infrastructure while adding jobs and year‑round visitors. ‘‘Having a water taxi there is humongous for this side of town,’’ one business owner said, noting the potential for more pedestrian traffic to support retail and restaurants.
The board noted receipt of dozens of written submissions (staff recorded about 118 letters at the time of the meeting) and concluded the public record will be weighed alongside technical testimony. The board’s eventual approval included conditions aimed at mitigating the most commonly raised concerns — event traffic management, parking plans, gated residential access and improvements to pedestrian facilities and wayfinding.
Speakers listed in the public record included Carolyn Firth, Seth Cohen, Peter Becker, Rick Bischoff, Pete Denton, several Coddington Landing residents and business owners, and others who spoke both for and against the proposal.
