Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning Board approves Waites Wharf redevelopment with traffic and public‑access conditions
Summary
After extensive public comment and expert testimony, the Newport Planning Board approved special‑use permits and preliminary development plans for Waites Wharf North and South, attaching conditions on parking management, event traffic, gated residential access, stormwater improvements and public harbor‑walk amenities.
The City of Newport Planning Board voted to approve special‑use permits and preliminary development plans for the Waites Wharf redevelopment on the North and South lots after more than five hours of testimony and public comment. The board attached a series of conditions that the applicant must meet before final administrative approval, including an ITC‑approved parking and event management plan, city‑engineer sign‑off on shared‑street details at the Thames/Wharf entrance, and documentation of stormwater and environmental remediation to RIDEM standards.
The applicant presented testimony from a multi‑disciplinary team — traffic, civil engineering, architecture and environmental experts — arguing the project meets the City’s specific and objective criteria for category‑3 special‑use permits and complies with development‑plan review standards. Traffic expert Lorenzo Dantes testified the proposed mix of hotel, restaurant, marina and residential uses would generate no net increase in daily trips compared with current uses in peak conditions, and identified targeted mitigation measures for peak and event activity. “The proponent and the applicant have agreed to mitigate some of those elements,” Dantes said, noting planned off‑site and on‑site circulation improvements and a water‑taxi stop.
Residents and business owners spoke both for and against the project. Opponents warned about daytime traffic shifts, narrow local streets and the scale of new buildings adjacent to longstanding small‑scale residential properties. “This project is just too big for our lovely neighborhood,” testified a local resident. Supporters said the plan would repair wharf infrastructure, add harbor‑walk access and bring economic activity to a less‑used section of the waterfront.
The board’s conditions require: a parking and event‑traffic management plan reviewed and approved by the Technical Review Committee (ITC); the city engineer’s approval of shared‑street surfacing, directional indicators and warning surfaces at the Thames–Wharf entrance; gated, key‑fob residential access with maintenance requirements; a water‑taxi shelter; and that new utilities be installed underground. The applicant also agreed to limit short‑term rentals in the new residential buildings by requiring 12‑month minimum leases.
Planning staff and board members repeatedly cited the staff report and technical reviews as the factual basis for approval. The board recorded the approvals as contingent on final engineering and on recording an administrative subdivision to merge parcels.
