Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Food Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board refers supermarket‑notice ordinance to GAO after supervisors back six‑month notice requirement

San Francisco Board of Supervisors · October 29, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisor Preston's ordinance would require large supermarkets to provide six months' notice, a community meeting and exploration of replacement options before permanent closure; the board duplicated the file and referred it to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee.

Supervisor Preston introduced an ordinance that would require large supermarkets to give six months’ notice to the city and customers before permanently closing, hold required meetings with community members, and explore replacement options prior to closure. The measure is framed as a response to a Safeway closure in the Fillmore neighborhood that alarmed residents and local leaders.

Preston said the ordinance includes a community‑meeting requirement and gives the Office of Economic and Workforce Development the authority to issue regulations to clarify covered stores. She noted stakeholders including HSA, DPH, MOCD, OEWD, the city attorney’s office, the California Grocers Association, chambers of commerce and labor partners participated in drafting and suggested the board duplicate the file and refer it to the Government Audit and Oversight Committee for possible clarifications. “The legislation requires 6 months notice, prior to the close of a grocery store, and a required meeting with community members,” Preston said.

President Peskin indicated the file was duplicated and the motion to refer — made by Supervisor Preston and seconded by Supervisor Stephanie — was taken without objection. Supervisors Walton and Safaie asked to be listed as cosponsors during the discussion. The item was announced as passed on 1st reading pending committee review.

Next steps: GAO will receive the duplicated file to consider whether technical clarifications are needed and, if necessary, recommend amendments before the board's next reading.