Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Litigation Reform topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public nuisance reform bill taken off notice after sponsor seeks more work
Summary
Sponsor of House Bill 26-9 said courts and litigants have expanded the public-nuisance doctrine into a broad litigation tool; the sponsor moved to take the bill off notice for more work and the committee agreed with no objection.
A sponsor described House Bill 26-9 as an attempt to narrow the public-nuisance doctrine and restore traditional elements such as definable harm, direct causation and a focus on stopping harm rather than generating monetary recoveries. The sponsor said courts and litigants have used the doctrine broadly, including in complex issues like climate litigation, and that the bill would clarify standards and preserve separation of powers.
The sponsor said more work was needed to answer members' questions and moved "to take this off notice." The chair asked for objections; none were raised and the bill was taken off notice. No vote tally was recorded for this procedural change in the transcript excerpt; the transcript records the sponsor motion and the chair's acceptance that the bill is off notice.
What it means: Taking a bill off notice removes it from active committee consideration for the time being so the sponsor can continue drafting or negotiating changes. The transcript records the rationale offered by the sponsor but no substitute text or amendments were adopted in committee.
