Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Personnel topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board approves several hires, substitutes and student-liaison appointments

Board of Education, Cherry Valley-Springfield Central School District · September 4, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

As part of the consent agenda, trustees accepted a resignation and approved multiple appointments: resignations, long-term substitute placements, creation of a long-term substitute teacher-aide position, a probationary cleaner appointment, mentor pairings and substitute rosters for the 2025–26 year; Ethan All and Hannah Sheldon were appointed student liaisons.

The Board approved a slate of personnel actions on Sept. 4 as part of its consent agenda. The Board accepted the resignation of part‑time Teacher Aide Katelyn Pasternak effective Aug. 29, 2025, appointed Tammie Waterman as a long‑term substitute Health and Special Education Teacher (Aug. 27, 2025–June 30, 2026) and appointed Elena Sheldon as a long‑term substitute Licensed Teacher Assistant (Aug. 27, 2025–June 26, 2026). The Board also created a long‑term substitute Teacher Aide position (effective Sept. 2, 2025–June 26, 2026) and appointed Chloe Thalheimer to that role.

Other personnel approvals included appointing Gerald Holmes as Cleaner with a probationary period beginning Sept. 22, 2025; approving mentor pairings (Ashley Bevins–Kristie Fassett; Christine Johnson–Sarah Williams; Tammie Waterman–Rebecca Robinson); listing Instructional Support and Instructional substitutes (including Luke Dubben, Chelsea Hull, Jennifer Bishop, Katelyn Pasternak and Chloe Thalheimer); and approving volunteer Amin Abdallah. The Board also appointed students Ethan All and Hannah Sheldon as Board Student Liaisons for the 2025–26 school year.

All personnel actions were recorded in the minutes as part of the consent agenda motion, which "carried unanimously." Dates and effective ranges were included in the resolution language recorded in the meeting minutes.