Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Capital Projects topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board shifts procurement method for Bailey project, selects Drake General Contractors and delegates contract authority

North Lamar Independent School District Board of Trustees · June 11, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Trustees removed the Bailey Demolition Infill Project from the construction manager‑at‑risk method, selected job order contracting, approved Drake General Contractors, LLC as vendor, and delegated negotiation authority to the superintendent and board president with a not‑to‑exceed price of $105,000.

The board voted to change procurement for the Bailey Demolition Infill Project, select a vendor and delegate negotiation authority.

Kelli Stewart presented a resolution to remove the project from the construction manager‑at‑risk (CMAR) delivery method and to select job order contracting as the procurement method. Bo Exum moved that the board "adopt and approve the resolution removing the Bailey Demolition Infill Project from the construction manager-at-risk delivery method and select job order contracting as the procurement method that provides the best value for the District for the project." Russell Jackson seconded; the motion carried 7-0.

The board then considered vendor selection under the TIPS cooperative purchasing program. Mike Davidson moved that the board "adopt and approve the resolution selecting Drake General Contractors, LLC as the Vendor to complete the Bailey Demolition Infill Project." Bo Exum seconded; motion carried 7-0. The board also voted to delegate authority to the superintendent and board president "to negotiate and approve the agreement with Drake not to exceed the price of $105,000." Russell Jackson seconded that motion; it carried 7-0.

The actions together change procurement approach, name a vendor and authorize district leaders to finalize the contract subject to the stated not‑to‑exceed amount. The minutes do not include the final contract or scope details beyond the procurement and price cap.