Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Missing Middle topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee discusses zoning barriers and 'missing middle' housing solutions

Buncombe County Housing Committee · December 2, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Land of Sky presenter and committee members identified zoning code thresholds, fire-code and permit constraints as major barriers to duplexes/triplexes and other 'missing middle' housing; small-scale infill and accessory dwelling units were highlighted as near-term strategies.

Committee members pressed the presenter on what housing product types could meet the projected demand. Jacob said barriers include building-code thresholds and fire standards that raise costs once a development exceeds two units, limiting duplexes, triplexes and quadplexes in many areas.

"Once you get to 3 or 4, that's when you have increased standards," Jacob said, arguing that state and local code thresholds and permitting complexity are a prohibitive factor for small-scale infill. Committee members pointed to permit-friendly changes in Hendersonville as an example of reforms that can yield more incremental units.

The presenter also described factory-built and modular options, citing a local company called Compact Cottages as an example of a prefab approach that could be permitted quickly and form part of a diversified production strategy. He noted stigma around manufactured housing remains a policy and political hurdle.

Panelists and the presenter identified site-selection constraints (steep slopes, floodplains, and privately owned underused commercial corridors such as mall sites) and emphasized the need for targeted land strategies, changes to zoning and development incentives to make 'missing middle' builds financially feasible. The committee did not adopt zoning changes at the meeting; members discussed these as policy directions to explore with planning staff.