Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates whether Scoscher development road must be dedicated to village; engineering review next step
Summary
Board members and participants discussed whether the proposed Scoscher/Scosha housing development should build a private road or one dedicated to the village, focusing on drainage, fire access, engineering review and long-term maintenance; the village engineer and planning board were identified as the next reviewers.
The board held an extended discussion about the proposed Scoscher (referred to in the transcript also as Scosha/Scoscher) development and whether the street serving the project must be dedicated to the village or can remain private. Speakers raised concerns about drainage, fire-truck access and turnarounds, whether the planning board had completed its review and the cost burdens associated with different choices.
Participants emphasized that the village engineer needs to review the developer's plans and that developer-paid engineering review is ordinary practice: "The developer ... pays for the village designated engineer," one participant (S5) said. The presiding official (S2) argued for village standards being met and said, "my thought is it should be a village street," while others noted the planning board's role and the need for the development to be built to village standards if it were later dedicated. The board recorded that the planning board meeting had been recorded and that Dave (as referenced in the planning meeting) would talk to the board about whether the road must be dedicated.
