Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies appeal to place moved shed on crushed‑stone foundation at 28107 West Oakland
Summary
The Board of Zoning Appeals voted down an appeal to allow a 256‑square‑foot moved shed to be set on crushed limestone without a new foundation, citing building-code concerns about uplift, wind and snow loads and the need for tied anchor bolts or an engineered uplift solution.
Get email alerts on the Building Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Zoning Appeals denied a request to allow a moved 12-by-16 shed to be placed on crushed limestone at 28107 West Oakland, rejecting the applicant’s appeal to the 2019 residential building code.
The applicant asked to keep a limestone footprint (18-by-18) rather than pour a new concrete slab and argued the shed move was a cost-saving measure and consistent with a neighbor’s prior arrangement. Board members and the building director said the building code requires a permanent foundation for structures of this size to resist uplift, wind and snow loads and to allow mechanical anchoring (anchor bolts). The building director advised that if a full foundation is undesired the applicant could present engineered details demonstrating compliance with uplift, wind and frost-protection requirements, but still would need the code interpretation to allow an alternate anchorage approach.
A motion to grant the appeal — permitting placement without a new foundation — was moved and seconded but failed on a roll-call vote; the board recorded negative votes from the members present. The board concluded that a concrete pad or an engineered anchorage solution was appropriate given the structure’s size and the safety considerations cited by staff.
