Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Waterfront Tod topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City consultants outline scope of cumulative environmental review for three waterfront sites
Summary
BFJ Planning presented a draft scoping outline for a cumulative environmental impact report (a SEQR‑style scoping document) covering three city‑owned waterfront commuter lots, including proposed technical chapters, traffic work done to date, and a public comment schedule with a Sept. 9 hearing and Sept. 6 public open house.
BFJ Planning principal Sarah Yackel told the Peekskill Planning Commission the city has retained the firm to prepare a cumulative environmental impact report that will analyze the combined effects of redeveloping three city‑owned commuter parking lots east of the Metro‑North tracks.
“We're at the very preliminary stages of this study and are really in the process of scoping out the table of contents,” Sarah Yackel said, explaining the document before the board is an outline that will guide subsequent analysis and public review. She said the study will look beyond individual site impacts to consider reasonably anticipated projects in the pipeline and identify mitigation and design recommendations that could guide future site‑specific SEQR reviews.
Yackel described a proposed set of technical chapters that mirror an environmental impact statement: project description, environmental setting, traffic and parking, stormwater and flooding (including sea‑level rise and resiliency), community facilities, and socioeconomics. She also summarized preliminary fieldwork: BFJ conducted traffic counts at seven intersections and parking surveys coordinated with MTA peak‑day ridership data to inform cumulative traffic and parking analysis.
The firm proposed a public schedule: a public open house and developer showcase Sept. 6, a planning commission public hearing Sept. 9 and a 30‑day written comment period on the outline; the final scope will be returned to the common council for acceptance on Sept. 22 before full environmental reporting begins. The commission was invited to provide written comments during the 30‑day review window.
The commission’s questions focused on scope boundaries: whether the study would analyze zoning‑driven “build‑out” across the waterfront or limit the analysis to the three nominated sites. Staff and BFJ said they will include known pipeline projects and reasonably anticipated zoning changes where those changes are necessary to the proposed redevelopments’ implementation, but the scoping document is not intended to be a full downtown build‑out study.
Next steps: the planning department will post the outline on the city website and accept written comments through the close of the public hearing period; the commission scheduled the scoping hearing for Sept. 9 and a community open house for Sept. 6.
